Eros and Civilization: A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud (; second edition, ) is a book by the German philosopher and social critic Herbert Marcuse. Eros Y Civilizacion has 4 ratings and 0 reviews: Eros Y Civilizacion. by. Helbert Marcuse Be the first to ask a question about Eros Y Civilizacion. Title: Eros y civilizacion Herbert marcuse, Author: Juanjose Negrete Jimenez, Name: Eros y civilizacion Herbert marcuse, Length: pages, Page:
|Published (Last):||17 September 2012|
|PDF File Size:||16.72 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||3.21 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Cover of the first edition.
Open Preview See a Problem? A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud ; second edition, is a book by the German philosopher and social critic Herbert Marcusein which the author proposes a non-repressive society, attempts a synthesis of the theories of Karl Marx and Sigmund Freudand explores the potential of collective memory to be a source of disobedience and revolt and point the way to an alternative future.
Elias Coll rated it really liked it Oct 05, Hencken described Eros and Civilization as an important example of the intellectual influence of psychoanalysis and an “interesting precursor” to a study of psychology of the “internalization of oppression” in the anthology Homosexuality: Marcuse has been credited with offering a convincing critique of Neo-Freudianismbut he has also been criticized for being utopian in his objectives and for misinterpreting Freud’s theories.
He maintained that Marcuse misinterpreted Freud’s views on the process of sublimationthough he considered this inevitable given Marcuse’s purposes, and noted that aspects of Marcuse’s “erotic utopia” seem regressive or infantile, as they involved instinctual gratification for its own sake.
Eros Y Civilizacion
Sebido marked it as to-read Jul 21, Discover Prime Book Box for Kids. Amazon Renewed Refurbished products with a warranty. Though granting that Marcuse proposed a “powerful image of a transformed sexuality” that had a major influence on posts sexual politics, he considered Marcuse’s vision “utopian”. Oppression and Liberation He argued that Marcuse tried to develop ideas that were already present in “the far less ambiguous language of Marxian theory”, but still welcomed the fact that Marcuse made psychoanalysis and dialectical materialism reach the same desired result.
Meanings, Myths and Modern Sexualities. However, Celarent considered Marcuse’s chapter giving “proper Freudian reasons for the historicity of the reality principle” to be of historical interest only, and wrote that Marcuse proposed a “shadowy utopia”.
The critic Frederick Crews argued in Out of Civilizackon System that Marcuse’s proposed liberation of instinct was not a real challenge to the status quo, since, by taking the position that such a liberation could only be attempted “after culture has done its work and created the mankind and the world that could be free”, Marcuse was accommodating society’s institutions. Product details Paperback Publisher: There’s a problem loading this menu right now. Mario Torres rated it it was amazing Dec 26, He questioned to what extent Marcuse’s readers understood his work, suggesting that many student activists might have shared the view of Morris Dickstein, to whom it work meant, “not some ontological breakthrough for human nature, but probably just plain fucking, lots of it”.
University of Queensland Press.
The gay rights activist Jeffrey Escoffier discussed Eros and Civilization in GLBTQ Social Scienceswriting that it “played an influential role in the writing of early proponents of gay liberation”, such as Altman and Martin Dubermanand “influenced radical gay groups such as the Gay Liberation Front’s Red Butterfly Collective”, which adopted as its motto the civiilzacion line from the “Political Preface” of the edition of the book: The discussion page civilizaciob contain suggestions.
He also maintained that Marcuse’s misinterpretation of Freud’s concept of reason undermined Marcuse’s argument, which privileged a confused concept of instinct over an ambiguous sense of reason.
Psychoanalysis and Male Homosexuality. Debating Gender, Debating Sexuality. However, she questioned their interpretations of Freud, argued that they see social relations as an unnecessary form of constraint and fail to explain maecuse social bonds and political activity are possible, criticized their view of “women, gender relations, and generation”, and maintained that their use of primary narcissism as a model for union with others involves too much concern with individual gratification.
The Cult of the Fact. Sexuality and Its Discontents: This book is not yet featured civklizacion Listopia. He suggested that there might be an affinity between Marcuse’s views and Jung’s, despite Marcuse’s contempt for Jung.
Eros and Civilization – Wikipedia
He saw Brown’s exploration of the radical implications of psychoanalysis as in some ways civulizacion rigorous and systematic than that of Marcuse. The philosopher Jeffrey Abramson credited Marcuse with changing the way he looked at the world and revealing “the terrible bleakness of social life” to him and forcing him to wonder why progress does “so little to end human misery and destructiveness” in Liberation and Its Limits The Death Drive in Text and Context.
Mattick credited Marcuse with renewing “the endeavor to read Marx into Freud”, following the unsuccessful attempts of Wilhelm Reichand agreed with Marcuse that Freudian revisionism is “reformist or non-revolutionary”.
Social, Psychological, and Biological Issues Porter, Roy; Keddie, Nikki R. He suggested that Marcuse found the gay liberation movement insignificant, and criticized Marcuse for ignoring it in Counterrevolution and Revolteven though many gay activists had been influenced by Eros and Civilization.
A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud Cover of the first edition. Marcuse concludes that our society’s troubles result not from biological repression itself but from its increase due to “surplus repression” which is the result of contemporary society.
Eros y civilizaciÃ³n: MARCUSE HERBERT: : Books
Marcuse’s argument depends on the assumption that instincts can be shaped by historical phenomena such as repression. Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Learn more about Amazon Prime.
Marcuse argues that “the irreconcilable conflict is not between work reality principle [life without leisure] and Eros pleasure principle [leisure and pleasure]but between alienated labour performance principle [economic stratification] and Eros. He believed that Marcuse followed speculations that were difficult to either support or refute, that his discussion of sex macuse pompous, that he failed to explain how people whose sexuality was unrepressed would behave, and uncritically accepted Freudian views of sexuality and failed to conduct his civilizacoon research into the topic.
Dialectic, revolt, and murder in the polity of the soul”. He argued that while Marcuse believed that American popular culture had trivialized sexual love, sex had not had a subversive effect in societies not dominated by American popular culture. Hegel’s Ontology and the Theory of Historicity. Tales from the Freudian Crypt: Freud claimed that a clash between Eros and civilization results in the history of Man being one of his repression: Celarent suggested that Eros and Civilization had commonly been misinterpreted, and that Marcuse was not concerned with advocating “free love and esoteric sexual positions.
Alford, writing innoted that Marcuse, like many of his critics, regarded Eros and Civilization as his most important work, but observed that Marcuse’s views have been criticized for being both too similar and too different to those of Freud.
Would you like to tell us about a lower price? He criticized Marcuse for his dismissive treatment of rival theories, such as those of Reich.