Arguably, David Howarth’s The Year of the Conquest is a succinct account of the major events that characterized the historic buildup to William the. The year is one of the most important dates in the history of the Western world: the year William the Conqueror defeated the English at the Battle. Trove: Find and get Australian resources. Books, images, historic newspapers, maps, archives and more.
|Published (Last):||16 October 2017|
|PDF File Size:||15.72 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||3.40 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Harald is quite an enigma to me still, and I’d like to read more about the “last of the great Vikings”. Paperback David Baldacci Books. Those were good, but personal. If you ever wondered why so many English words have French roots, you only need look at what happened in Nevertheless, he leaves room for the reader to make a conclusion as to which account carries more credibility.
Jan 06, Deb rated it it was amazing. Skip to main content. Return to Book Page. A combination of shifting politics at court and a childless 0166 is seldom a good thing for medieval kingdoms. He gives a great view of the daily life of Englanders before the Normans and, though he does seem a little “Anglo-centric” at times, it is definitely a good read.
We are experiencing technical difficulties.
Aug 27, Pages. It’s especially enjoyable if you like a good underdog story, one where that lowly hero doesn’t even win, but rath The last time England was successfully conquered by a foreign army?
Further proof that the key to good historical writing is not having an argument. I just really liked how Howarth meticulously, joyfully crawls inside an iconic event in British history -the Battle of Hastings-to reveal the underlying moving parts. I quite agree with Howarth’s assessment of the principal characters; how he’d have liked King Harold, felt sorry for Tostig, and been terrified of William.
The Muse of History rarely guarantees a happy ending, and rare is the conquest that improves the lives of the conquered. Some will see this as blatant revisionism, because some don’t read the fine print, and the print isn’t all that fine.
Howarth interjects the necessary background information for each character when they appear for the first time in the year So I had a basic understanding of how the Normans had influenced England.
Right down to the motivation for why you’re going about Conquesting in the first place. Mar 28, Mary Hemenway rated it it was amazing. I believe anyone interested in the Middle Ages should read this book because it demonstrates the importance of good historiography.
The book moves at a great pace, and at just above pages is a quick introduction.
Review of The Year of the Conquest by David Howarth – Essay Sample
Harold was a good king and would have served the English well. Read it Forward Read it first. The events leading to-and following-this turning point in history are shrouded in mystery.
To have a skilled historian like Howarth guide you through an alien time period doesn’t eliminate the mystery of understanding but it does enhance i I just really liked how Howarth meticulously, joyfully crawls inside an iconic event in British history -the Battle of Hastings-to reveal the underlying moving parts.
I picked it up again because I was going to teh the Bayeux Tapestry IRL and I wanted to refresh my memory on the history surrounding the events it depicts.
by David Howarth | : Books
In the treacherous times that were 11th century Normandy, William was lucky to escape childhood with his life. Trending Price New. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. I loved that the author takes several different accounts of the time and uses his common sense and available historic knowledge to deliver his history of England in Howarth describes the English commoners: Promises made for advantage when it suited Edward. Harald is q So fantastically written, I easily could have read it cover to cover in one sitting.
The events of changed European history. This may be one of those cases where ‘truth is stranger than fiction.
I would say this is uear of the top five best history books I have ever read. Even knowing the outcome ahead of time, the story is still so engrossing that you can’t help but keep turning the page. As stated elsewhere in this essay, the conquestt draws his information from a stream of diverse sources and most importantly a good number of the sources consulted are contemporary materials that give the author the advantage of having an insightful pool of information to guide the work done.
Unlike other chroniclers, Howarth plays down William’s sponsorship by yexr enlightened Pope Hildebrand; instead he stresses the autocracy imposed to resettle Normans at the expense of thousands of English natives. From this point he then skillfully articulates the viewpoint he considers more accurate, not all he provides a justification for the stance he takes.
Its nostalgia for roughshod feudalism gives the book a decided slant, but also endows the contested shires with new life, if not importantly new scholarship.
Bookman’s Alley in Evanston is closing, the owner being up in his eighties. Drawing on a wealth of contemporary sources, David Howarth gives us memorable portraits of the kings: Oct 31, May Ling rated it it was amazing Shelves: In doing so conqjest reader gets the advantage of flowing along the main events of the story without the trouble of taking in too many gowarth details.
I realize that is basically inevitable when telling a nearly year old history, but it’s easier to make guesses about battle tactics than it is about a person’s thoughts.